November 19, 2014

JLA Board Resigns Over Licensing Terms

jla cover JLA Board Resigns Over Licensing TermsEditor-in-chief Damon Jaggars and the whole editorial board of the Journal of Library Administration resigned en masse on March 22 over the journal’s licensing terms.

On the following day, the board sent an email to prospective contributors explaining their decision, explaining that “a large and growing number” of authors have pushed back on the terms, including several who refused to publish, and have repeatedly requested a Creative Commons license instead. (Jason Griffey, one of the authors who provided that push back, detailed his experience and applauded the board’s decision.)

Brian Mathews, who received the email, quoted it as saying, “After much discussion, the only alternative presented by Taylor & Francis tied a less restrictive license to a $2,995 per article fee to be paid by the author.  As you know, this is not a viable licensing option for authors from the LIS community, who are generally not conducting research under large grants.”

The board hasn’t made any public statement, but Chris Bourg, one of the board members, explained her own motivation for participating. She also Tweeted, “I really feel that we gave [Taylor & Francis] a chance to work toward a decent model, but they wouldn’t bend.” Jaggars posted to Twitter that Taylor & Francis “worked with us in good faith. They can’t yet see past their current model to address the evolving expectations of LIS authors.”

In a statement issued on Tuesday, Tracy Roberts, the editorial director of journals at Taylor & Francis, told the Chronicle of Higher Education, “Our License grants significant reuse rights to authors (pre-prints, non-embargoed post-prints, sharing, classroom use, presentation at conferences, republication in existing or new form), whilst we ask only for a sole license over the published version of record… There seemed to be a misunderstanding and some sort of conflation of the different licenses that Taylor and Francis is offering,” Ms. Roberts said.

However Danny Kingsley, Executive Officer of the Australian Open Access Support Group, doesn’t see it that way. According to Kingsley, among the terms are that authors not only may not deposit the publisher’s version of the paper in their institutional repository, they may only put the post-peer reviewed and corrected version into the repository 12-18 months after publication. Adding on the time between acceptance and publication, it may take two to five years from when the research was done before it is made open access.

In addition to Jaggars, Associate University Librarian for Collections & Services at Columbia University, the board was also composed of:

  • Kristin Antelman, Associate Director for the Digital Library, North Carolina State University
  • Chris Bourg, Assistant University Librarian for Public Services, Stanford University
  • Lisa German, Associate Dean for Collections, Information & Access Services, Penn State University
  • Fred M. Heath, Vice Provost & Director of Libraries, University of Texas at Austin
  • Paula T. Kaufman, Dean of Libraries & University Librarian, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Deanna B. Marcum, Managing Director, Ithaka S+R
  • Sarah C. Michalak, Associate Provost & University Librarian, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • James G. Neal, Vice President for Information Services & University Librarian, Columbia University
  • Ann J. Wolpert, Director of Libraries,   Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The International Editorial Board included Makoto Nakamoto, Administrative Library Director, Waseda University; and Stephen Town, Director of Information & University Librarian, University of York.

This is not the first time an editorial board has resigned en masse, or even the first time in the library world: In 1998 most of the editorial board of the Journal of Academic Librarianship resigned over the issue of subscription prices. Several of the editors who resigned then created Portal: Libraries and the Academy at Johns Hopkins University Press. Such a move is often followed by creating an Open Access journal. However, no such announcement has been made in this case.

This article was featured in Library Journal's Academic Newswire enewsletter. Subscribe today to have more articles like this delivered to your inbox for free.

Meredith Schwartz About Meredith Schwartz

Meredith Schwartz (mschwartz@mediasourceinc.com) is Senior Editor, News and Features of Library Journal.

Share

Comments

  1. Tracy Roberts says:

    We regret the recent resignation of the Editor and Board of Journal of Library Administration. We had high hopes for the Editorship of Damon Jaggers, and it is disappointing to see it conclude so abruptly after only twelve weeks.

    The current publishing environment around licensing and author rights is continually evolving. We consider ourselves to be a forward-looking Publisher on author rights. Feedback from our Library and Information Science editors and authors has resulted in our innovative LIS Author Pilot. Under the terms of the Pilot, authors are invited to sign a License to Publish (rather than assign copyright) and are able to post their article within repositories without any embargo period applied; so true Green OA. Our License grants significant reuse rights to authors (pre-prints, non-embargoed post-prints, sharing, classroom use, presentation at conferences, republication in existing or new form), whilst we ask only for a sole license over the published version of record. JLA had the best “Green Open Access” route option available as authors do not have to pay an Author Publishing Charge (APC) in order to achieve full Open Access at the point of publication.

    Since 2011, this has been the case for all journals in the Library & Information Science (LIS) portfolio at Taylor & Francis where authors have been able to freely post their (“post-print”) author-accepted manuscript immediately on publication – ie without any embargo. Details of the Routledge/Taylor & Francis LIS pilot when it was announced are available here:
    http://www.informa.com/Media-centre/Press-releases–news/Latest-News/Routledge-trials-new-author-rights-policy-for-Library-and-Information-Science-Journals1/

    There is no requirement for JLA authors to pay an APC in order to publish on an immediate Open Access basis in the JLA. Taylor & Francis’ APC Open Access ‘Gold’ model, T&F Open Select, has been implemented as an option for authors to comply with the recent RCUK and Wellcome Trust funder mandates where the PDF and HTML versions on the publisher platform are immediately made free to access on those journals where there is an embargo period on author accepted version posting in a repository:
    http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicyandRevisedguidance.pdf

    Taylor & Francis regularly reviews author documents and since late last year we have been working on new versions for release. Those versions will provide greater choice and more immediate clarity to our authors about the rights they retain. As we have always done, we will continue to engage with the library community to hear their concerns, and to tailor our approach to their needs.

    For a complete explanation of our current LIS Author Rights Policy, please visit the following link: http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/preparation/lisrights.asp

    Tracy Roberts
    Editorial Director, Journals
    Taylor & Francis Group