August 31, 2014

Ignorantly or Wisely | Blatant Berry

DSC1770 170x170 Ignorantly or Wisely | Blatant BerryI return once or twice a year to the first statement of our mission in Upon the Objects to be Attained by the Establishment of a Public Library, the 1852 Report of the Trustees of the Public Library of the City of Boston. Possibly the most important document in the history of the free public library in the United States, the report spells out the justifications for the establishment of such a library in that city. To me the most compelling passage (p. 15) is this one:

For it has been rightly judged that,—under political, social and religious institutions like ours—it is of paramount importance that the means of general information should be so diffused that the largest possible number of persons should be induced to read and understand questions going down to the very foundations of social order, which are constantly presenting themselves, and which we, as a people, are required to decide, and do decide, either ignorantly or wisely.

That founding mandate, so often observed in the breach, is as urgent now as it was when it was first articulated in 1852. Today we face not only a massive inundation of information but also a host of forces trying either to distort, misinterpret, or simply lock up content to gain an advantage in commerce and the marketplace, in political arenas, or in the endless power struggles in world affairs.

In the debates over U.S. involvement in Syria’s civil war, we have been asked to decide on the use of military force, with only sparse intelligence. In the dissemination of crucial research results, we have seen our copyright and patent laws abused for profit and competitive gain, at great cost to consumers. We have witnessed the use of frightening misinformation and outright mendacity to create unprecedented political stalemates at the national, state, and local levels. We have watched the corruption of some of our broadcast media, often after their acquisition by those seeking a political or commercial advantage. We have even seen attacks on our public libraries because they have tried to present full information on all sides of issues.

And we have watched public opinion become suspicious of the motivation and accuracy of nearly every source of information, every agency of government, and every social institution.

As a society, we created our systems of public education and public libraries to address the need of the people to be informed. We learned, early on, that we can’t rely on the individuals and agencies competing for an elected or a financial edge to provide us with all that we need to know. We realized that only entities owned by and working for all the populace could be trusted to provide full, free access to what we need to know to govern ourselves properly.

The Boston trustees spelled this out in that wonderfully elaborate language of their time. Despite its quaint, dated style, the message resonates with as much clear and compelling force as it did in the 19th century. Soon after it was delivered, the people built the great Boston Public Library and carved the message “Free to all” over its entrance.

In this era in which information and misinformation coexist and compete in all of our most popular channels and messages pile up in our inboxes, a public agency with a mandate to enlighten all the people is more important than ever. That agency must enlist a staff of expert professionals—librarians—to help people sort through the messages and understand how to assess their validity, how to judge, from the source, their biases.

All of this must, of course, be “free to all,” tax-supported so everyone can use it. We’ll have to take a more proactive role in evaluating sources, even before we’re invited to do so, all the more those from governments and other trusted institutions. We’ll have to serve as fact-checkers on every aspect of the public discourse, helping citizens see how interested parties may have corrupted the information they offer. We must bring a new militancy to our efforts to ensure that copyright serves its original purpose, “to promote the progress of science and the useful arts,” and does not become another tool to commodify information. We’ll need a new, stronger advocacy to convince voters and those whom they elect that they need to support our efforts to fight the forces trying to control and corrupt the flow of information for their own ends.

john berry signature Ignorantly or Wisely | Blatant Berry

This article was published in Library Journal's October 1, 2013 issue. Subscribe today and save up to 35% off the regular subscription rate.

John N. Berry III About John N. Berry III

John N. Berry III (jberry@mediasourceinc.com) is Editor-at-Large, LJ. Berry joined the magazine in 1964 as Assistant Editor, becoming editor-in-Chief in 1969 and serving in that role until 2006.

Share

Comments

  1. This dovetails perfectly with the broad “education” mission of LJ’s Library of the Year (Howard Co. MD).

Comment Policy:
  1. Be respectful, and do not attack the author or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  3. Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through (though some comments with links to multiple URLs are held for spam-check moderation by the system). If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.

We accept clean XHTML in comments, but don't overdo it and please limit the number of links submitted in your comment. For more info, see the full Terms of Use.

Speak Your Mind

*