October 31, 2014

Show Your Work | Peer to Peer Review

Barbara Fister newswire Show Your Work | Peer to Peer ReviewI am always amazed that people who have ideas to share don’t actually take steps to share them. Yes, academic librarians, I’m looking at you. Why is it that librarians agitate for open access and, at the same time, are content to put their own scholarship behind paywalls?

I can’t tell you how often I’ve seen a tempting reference to a recent article that appears in a journal to which my library doesn’t subscribe. Most of the time, that means I won’t read it. Our collection supports our curriculum, and we don’t have a library science program. You know something? Most academic libraries don’t. I could request the article through interlibrary loan, but if enough of my colleagues request articles from that journal, we begin to pay copyright fees that are usually quite high—high enough that it essentially means there’s a book we won’t buy so that I could read that one article. If I really need the article, I will likely pursue it, but if I’m simply interested, I probably won’t. Why on earth would we want to discourage one another from indulging in professional curiosity? That way lies missing the things we didn’t know we needed.

Presumably librarians publish at least in part in order to make their ideas public. Even if you choose to publish in a toll access library publication, most of them allow authors to deposit their work publicly in preprint or postprint form. (Personally, I wouldn’t submit work to one that doesn’t. There is no need for us to hide our lights under those particular bushels. The best bushels aren’t so unenlightened.)

Some librarians say they publish because they have to, not because they feel they have something valuable to say. I’m sorry for anyone stuck in a job where they have to do research against their will and perhaps under conditions that require something without supporting it. I’m even sadder that people in our profession—our fascinating profession—can’t find something about which to be systematically curious.

I’ve also heard librarians say our literature is rubbish. That’s not a particularly persuasive reason to avoid improving it. If you can’t imagine any way to write something valuable about what we do, then you probably really mean “I think our profession is rubbish,” in which case, there are a lot of good librarians out there who would like your job.

I suspect some librarians don’t post their work online because they don’t have an institutional repository. Guess what—you don’t need one! You can post it on your own institutional profile page or personal website, or deposit it in E-LIS, our very own professional repository. If you don’t know how to put stuff online, it’s well past time to learn. That’s fairly basic How To Be a Librarian 101.

Library school faculty, can I make a special appeal here? Why on earth don’t you make every single article you’ve published available to us practitioners? We have such a short time to be trained professionally in your programs, and you keep discovering new things after we graduate. We have to keep on learning even after we leave the training nest. Most of us will not be able to subscribe to the journals you publish in, so unless you are thoughtful and publish in open access journals, we probably won’t benefit from your work. Unless you are ashamed of your work or ashamed of the profession you are in, you should make your research public for the audience that can benefit from it. Those of you at public universities in particular—what are you thinking?

Also, you know how it’s really valuable to use a library as your patrons do, in order to get the user experience? It’s the same with scholarly communication. If you ever tell a faculty member in another department that journals are too expensive, that open access is a good thing, and your own work isn’t open access, set aside time right now to fix that problem. It’s not just so that you won’t be a hypocrite, though that’s a good enough reason. It’s so that you’ll get a feel for what’s involved and you’ll be able to help them through the process.

No excuses. Do it.

This article was featured in Library Journal's Academic Newswire enewsletter. Subscribe today to have more articles like this delivered to your inbox for free.

Barbara Fister About Barbara Fister

Barbara Fister is a librarian at Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter, MN, a contributor to ACRLog, and an author of crime fiction. Her latest mystery, Through the Cracks (see review), was published in 2010 by Minotaur Books.
Photo by Debora Miller

Share

Comments

  1. I agree with everything Barbara has written. High time librarians made their papers available to the profession.

    • Thanks, Eileen. It may be a bit of a challenge to fit self-archiving or seeking out open access options or negotiating terms at first, but once you’ve done it a time or two, it’s not difficult to keep up. After putting work into scholarship, adding these extra steps seems a small thing with a big potential impact.

  2. Addendum:

    Meredith Farkas has written a brilliant blog post on her approach to open access publishing while on the tenure track. http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2013/10/23/opening-up-knowledge-on-the-tenure-track/

    The Hedgehog Librarian has also been chronicling her adventures in open access while on the tenure clock. http://hedgehoglibrarian.com/category/open-access-tenure/

    Apologies to anyone also doing this who I’m forgetting at the moment. Need. More. Coffee.

  3. Bob Weaver says:

    At my institution, very few of the librarians write anything, but if we do, it goes into our IR. I think that the two big reasons for the lack of output are 1) we’re too busy with our regular duties to make the time to write and 2) there is almost zero inducement from the administration to do so, and corollary to that, no assistance or reward for doing so. My school does not grant tenure, and I made it through my last academic promotion with pretty much no professional writing to my credit. I’d love to see more library professional writing, but around here the working culture does not foster it. What are the best OA journals for library science?

  4. Go Gusties!