<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Public Librarians Have any Standards?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/2013/01/03/do-public-librarians-have-any-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/2013/01/03/do-public-librarians-have-any-standards/</link>
	<description>Whatever It Is, I&#039;m Against It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:24:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Librarian from England</title>
		<link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/2013/01/03/do-public-librarians-have-any-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-249469</link>
		<dc:creator>Librarian from England</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/?p=1730#comment-249469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to add to this, it has always been the tradition at Cambridge University Library (a copyright library) that only academic works should be catalogued.  Other works were just shelved according to date published.  This includes all the works of Dickens, considered potboilers in the 19th century.

People read different kinds of books for different times in their lives.  Sometimes they need to be taken out of their world and themselves and just be immersed in the story: they need escapism!  That is where romance novels score so highly.  They have a feel good factor and a recent study  showed that reading a romance novel actually reduced hormonal stress levels dramatically.  A postcard I have on my wall shows a group of people crammed into the London tube  (the underground)like sardines (a daily reality for commuters), with one woman saying to another &quot;I cannot understand why you read romance novels&quot;.  The bubble over her companion&#039;s head shows a tropical island, sunshine, gorgeous beaches and a hunky man kissing her hand.  I rest my case!

Add to this the RNA&#039;s stats about the background of women who both read and write romance novels which is largely educated to university standard and beyond, the fact that Georgette Heyer&#039;s novel, The Infamous Army is the only novel in the library at Sandhurst becuase of it&#039;s excellent depiction of the battle of Waterloo and it becomes clear that the kind of sweeping arrogant generalisation in Angry Librarian&#039;s post is at bets ill-informed at worst ignorant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to add to this, it has always been the tradition at Cambridge University Library (a copyright library) that only academic works should be catalogued.  Other works were just shelved according to date published.  This includes all the works of Dickens, considered potboilers in the 19th century.</p>
<p>People read different kinds of books for different times in their lives.  Sometimes they need to be taken out of their world and themselves and just be immersed in the story: they need escapism!  That is where romance novels score so highly.  They have a feel good factor and a recent study  showed that reading a romance novel actually reduced hormonal stress levels dramatically.  A postcard I have on my wall shows a group of people crammed into the London tube  (the underground)like sardines (a daily reality for commuters), with one woman saying to another &#8220;I cannot understand why you read romance novels&#8221;.  The bubble over her companion&#8217;s head shows a tropical island, sunshine, gorgeous beaches and a hunky man kissing her hand.  I rest my case!</p>
<p>Add to this the RNA&#8217;s stats about the background of women who both read and write romance novels which is largely educated to university standard and beyond, the fact that Georgette Heyer&#8217;s novel, The Infamous Army is the only novel in the library at Sandhurst becuase of it&#8217;s excellent depiction of the battle of Waterloo and it becomes clear that the kind of sweeping arrogant generalisation in Angry Librarian&#8217;s post is at bets ill-informed at worst ignorant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Librarian from England</title>
		<link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/2013/01/03/do-public-librarians-have-any-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-249467</link>
		<dc:creator>Librarian from England</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/?p=1730#comment-249467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brilliantly put, Rachel!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliantly put, Rachel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/2013/01/03/do-public-librarians-have-any-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-243205</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/?p=1730#comment-243205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I gather from this article that it is the librarian&#039;s professional duty to interpret what is literature and what is not.

But it isn&#039;t.  There is and never has been an official literary canon, so what constitutes literature comes down to a matter of taste and whimsy.  The study of literature is not concerned with the merit of a work, but what is being said, and how it is said.

While Harlequin romance novels may be formulaic and considered trashy by many, so were Ann Radcliffe novels in their day.  Yet posterity views Radcliffe with a somewhat kinder view than she may have been afforded in her time.  It&#039;s impossible to say that, 100 years from now, an author operating in the romance novel milieu will not garner fame for exceptional literary quality despite having spent most of his or her life peddling what is considered the dregs of fiction by today&#039;s fashionable literati.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gather from this article that it is the librarian&#8217;s professional duty to interpret what is literature and what is not.</p>
<p>But it isn&#8217;t.  There is and never has been an official literary canon, so what constitutes literature comes down to a matter of taste and whimsy.  The study of literature is not concerned with the merit of a work, but what is being said, and how it is said.</p>
<p>While Harlequin romance novels may be formulaic and considered trashy by many, so were Ann Radcliffe novels in their day.  Yet posterity views Radcliffe with a somewhat kinder view than she may have been afforded in her time.  It&#8217;s impossible to say that, 100 years from now, an author operating in the romance novel milieu will not garner fame for exceptional literary quality despite having spent most of his or her life peddling what is considered the dregs of fiction by today&#8217;s fashionable literati.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cristysoh</title>
		<link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/2013/01/03/do-public-librarians-have-any-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-236066</link>
		<dc:creator>cristysoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/?p=1730#comment-236066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perpetuating stereotypes of any kind is a sign of ignorance.  Southerners, homeschoolers, romance novels, public librarians.  

Creating an argument for the sake of arguing.  How about addressing some real library issues?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perpetuating stereotypes of any kind is a sign of ignorance.  Southerners, homeschoolers, romance novels, public librarians.  </p>
<p>Creating an argument for the sake of arguing.  How about addressing some real library issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somewhatstressedoutlibrarianguy</title>
		<link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/2013/01/03/do-public-librarians-have-any-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-233922</link>
		<dc:creator>somewhatstressedoutlibrarianguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 05:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/?p=1730#comment-233922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, and by the way, elitists like AL were one of the reasons I got out of academia. Beware, academic libraries need to stay vital, too!  Some of the worst public service I&#039;ve ever witnessed, I saw in my time in academia.  This happens to be one of the reason my old institution is a sinking ship. 

I still like the elitist crap you post, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and by the way, elitists like AL were one of the reasons I got out of academia. Beware, academic libraries need to stay vital, too!  Some of the worst public service I&#8217;ve ever witnessed, I saw in my time in academia.  This happens to be one of the reason my old institution is a sinking ship. </p>
<p>I still like the elitist crap you post, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somewhatstressedoutlibrarianguy</title>
		<link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/2013/01/03/do-public-librarians-have-any-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-233918</link>
		<dc:creator>somewhatstressedoutlibrarianguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 05:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/?p=1730#comment-233918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amen to this.  Street lit. walks off the shelves (literally). A little over a year ago I came to professional public library work from an academic milieu.  It has been one hell of an adjustment to me.  But I needed a job with more stability--and we give the people what they want.  

Add Playaways and CDs to that list . . . 

We are all about InfoTainment, but at least my job isn&#039;t about to be cut every 4 months.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to this.  Street lit. walks off the shelves (literally). A little over a year ago I came to professional public library work from an academic milieu.  It has been one hell of an adjustment to me.  But I needed a job with more stability&#8211;and we give the people what they want.  </p>
<p>Add Playaways and CDs to that list . . . </p>
<p>We are all about InfoTainment, but at least my job isn&#8217;t about to be cut every 4 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common librarian</title>
		<link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/2013/01/03/do-public-librarians-have-any-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-233585</link>
		<dc:creator>common librarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/?p=1730#comment-233585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[unfortunately, it is the elitist attitude that keeps most uneducated people (those very same people we are supposed to be helping) away from the public library.  
the three things people come into our libraries for?  computer access, dvds and street lit.  
do our librarians want to buy what we &#039;think&#039; our patrons should be reading?  of course.  
does any of that circulate?  not on your life.

yes, we spend thousands upon thousands of dollars on crappy literature purely for the entertainment value.  but guess, what?  we also have nearly the highest circulation levels in our state.  and in the public library world, circulation is everything!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unfortunately, it is the elitist attitude that keeps most uneducated people (those very same people we are supposed to be helping) away from the public library.<br />
the three things people come into our libraries for?  computer access, dvds and street lit.<br />
do our librarians want to buy what we &#8216;think&#8217; our patrons should be reading?  of course.<br />
does any of that circulate?  not on your life.</p>
<p>yes, we spend thousands upon thousands of dollars on crappy literature purely for the entertainment value.  but guess, what?  we also have nearly the highest circulation levels in our state.  and in the public library world, circulation is everything!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PW</title>
		<link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/2013/01/03/do-public-librarians-have-any-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-232730</link>
		<dc:creator>PW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/?p=1730#comment-232730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And every reluctant reader of a Shakespeare comedy will be relieved to know that all of his comedies must be removed from English class lists as they use that standard romance plot and hence are &quot;bad literature.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And every reluctant reader of a Shakespeare comedy will be relieved to know that all of his comedies must be removed from English class lists as they use that standard romance plot and hence are &#8220;bad literature.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annoyed Librarian</title>
		<link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/2013/01/03/do-public-librarians-have-any-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-232341</link>
		<dc:creator>Annoyed Librarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/?p=1730#comment-232341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a given.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Public Librarian</title>
		<link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/2013/01/03/do-public-librarians-have-any-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-231810</link>
		<dc:creator>Public Librarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lj.libraryjournal.com/blogs/annoyedlibrarian/?p=1730#comment-231810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes AL we do.  When you write posts like this, you become the annoying librarian.  Write something interesting instead of this elitist dribble.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes AL we do.  When you write posts like this, you become the annoying librarian.  Write something interesting instead of this elitist dribble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: lj.libraryjournal.com @ 2013-05-21 15:15:28 by W3 Total Cache -->