Annoyed Librarian
Search LibraryJournal.com ....
Subscribe to LJ
Inside Annoyed Librarian

Librarian for a Day

If you want a heartwarming story about a library sort of making a girl’s dream come true, read this article about a library in Cincinnati making a 14-year-old girl a “librarian for a day.”

She “got a gray library shirt and an official employee ID. She alphabetized books, learned the computer system and got to explore behind staff-only doors.” And thus she learned just how boring it can be to be a librarian.

She finds working in the library calming, and says “You don’t have to worry about anything,” and “You don’t have to worry about failing.”

That’s probably not the kind of thing she would want to put on a library school application someday, but still, it’s nice.

Despite the constant grumblings, there are probably a lot of librarians who find their work calming. They just don’t say that on social media because they know it would make all the harried librarian jealous and resentful.

I could help but compare that article to this one. Partly it’s because the page formatting looks identical, even though they’re from two different cities and states. But mostly it’s the contrast between them.

The Westwood Branch Library in Cincinnati hosts a “librarian for a day.” The Westland, MI public library is firing five of their reference librarians and replacing some of them with part-time library assistants to save money.

The five positions eliminated from the budget came from the reference department, she said, which had eight librarians. That was compared to youth services, which had three librarians and three part-time library associates.

Large departments of reference librarians should learn to fear zero-based budgeting, it seems.

Partly why this is “news” is that firing so many librarians at once is hardly the norm, but it is becoming more normal to hire part-cime assistants in the place of degreed librarians.

A Kind Reader emailed me recently after studying the effect of degreed librarians on outputs from public libraries and finding there was no correlation. We might believe the MLS has some particular value, but it’s not always easy to prove it.

Given the way librarians themselves sometimes talk it can’t really be surprising. All the activities librarians tout these days to stay “relevant” are things that don’t require any advanced degree to perform.

You don’t need a library degree to help people use computers, for example. Libraries provide all sorts of services related to that, and the only thing they need is people who know how to use computers.

It’s not like library schools teach special classes on helping people fill out online job applications or running makerspaces, although maybe they’ll start so they can stay “relevant” as well.

There are still plenty of jobs that require actual librarians, but not as many as there used to be.

The question these two articles suggest is whether it’s ethical any longer to encourage people to become public librarians. Libraries are getting by okay with fewer degreed librarians and more library assistants. There are stories galore online of public librarians being under- or unemployed for years after getting their degree.

It hasn’t been practical to encourage people for years, but we might have reached the point where it’s not ethical either. Encouraging young people who want to be librarians is possibly setting them up for inevitable failure in the future through no fault of their own.

By the time that girl in Ohio is ready for library school, eight years at least and maybe more, the bad jobs situation will probably be more advanced. Library assistant might be the only new job left in libraries. That day she was librarian for a day might be the only day she’ll ever get to be a librarian, even if she gets an MLS.

If anyone asked my advice about going to library school these days, maybe especially to become a school or public librarian, I’d probably have to say don’t do it except under special circumstances. I’m not sure I’d want any other answer on my conscience.

Share
Comment Policy:
  1. Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  3. Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
  4. Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media, per our Terms of Use.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through (though some comments with links to multiple URLs are held for spam-check moderation by the system). If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.

We accept clean XHTML in comments, but don't overdo it and please limit the number of links submitted in your comment. For more info, see the full Terms of Use.

Speak Your Mind

*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE